Burali-Forti paradox

alternative Burali-Forti's paradox

1. mathematicsThe paradox that supposing the existence of a set of all ordinal numbers leads to a contradiction; construed as meaning that it is not a properly defined set.

   The Burali-Forti paradox was discovered by Cantor in 1895 and Burali-Forti in 1897, but was not regarded by them as a paradox.

   2002, Marcus Giaquinto, The Search for Certainty: A Philosophical Account of Foundations of Mathematics, Oxford University Press (Clarendon Press), page 37

   2 more examples

   1984, Michael Hallett, Cantorian Set Theory and Limitation of Size, Oxford University Press (Clarendon Press), 1986, Paperback, page 186, Like them, Mirimanoff concentrates on the Burali-Forti paradox, and like Russell's analysis before, Mirimanoff shows how. in terms of size, the Burali-Forti paradox is basic and that if we solve this the other paradoxes will be solved too.

   1994 [Routledge], Ivor Grattan-Guinness (editor), Companion Encyclopedia of the History and Philosophy of the Mathematical Sciences, Volume 1, 2003, Johns Hopkins University Press, Paperback, page 632, In the first place, Berry rejected Russell's solution to the Burali-Forti paradox, claiming that it was easy to prove that the set of all ordinal numbers was a well-ordered set (and that Cantor had actually done it).