aceflux

If we asked five different people who each claimed one of the aforementioned identities (asexual, graysexual, aceflux, zedsexual and someone who experiences sexual attraction but not in high amounts) to each place themselves on the same spectrum, […] [quoting someone else] I used a bracket to show how my aceflux identity exists between experiencing little to medium amounts of attraction.

2016, Ashley Mardell, The ABCs of LGBT+, s, unnumbered page

[…] Responses of gray-asexual, ace, asexual, acroflux, aceflux, and demisexual [people] were collapsed into the category of “asexual.”

2016, Vern Harner, Risk Factors, Unmet Needs, and Perceived Service Needs of Gender/Sexual Minority Emerging Adults in Phoenix

In the context of emergent taxonomy, asexuality, ace, the range or spectrum of asexual sensibilities, aceflux and even aromantic identities are not produced within a binary framework that would pivot between the asexual/sexual assigned against moral/immoral or proper/improper dichotomised stereotypes.

2018, Rob Cover, Emergent Identities: New Sexualities, Genders and Relationships in a Digital Era, unnumbered page

I prefer websites, but most of my friends use apps. (24, female/non-binary, bisexual/demisexual/asexual spectrum/aceflux/aromantic)

2019, Paul Byron, “'Apps are cool but generally pretty pointless': LGBTIQ+ young people's mental health app ambivalence”, in Media International Australia, volume 171, number 1, page 58