inclusibility

[T]here is to be underſtood, the inceptive or beginning Will, of Nature, viɀ: the Incluſibility or Comprehenſibility of Centers, where every Center, in the diviſibility includeth it ſelf into a place to ſelf-hood, and ſelf-willing; […]

1661, Jacob Behme, translated by John Sparrow, “Of the Divine Visibility Vision or Contemplation: […]”, in The Highly Pretious Gate of the Divine Vision or Contemplation. […] (Several Treatises: of Jacob Behme […]), London: […] M. S. for Lodowick Lloyd, […], →OCLC, page 7

As I have found my master mystic give me more apprehensible ideas of what the Trinity in Unity is than I could ever gain elsewhere, I shall quote two of his numerous attempts to bring that triune being within range of thought. “[…] The word Son is that which is effected or wrought by the power—viz., the inclusibility of the willing, wherein the threefold spirit closeth itself, viz., a place of the Divine I-hood, or selfness” (note that).

1882 December, A. J. Penny, “Difficulties of Belief in the Incarnation of the Word. A Study in [Jakob] Bœhme’s School.”, in The Psychological Review: […], volume V, London: The Psychological Press Association, […] and Edward W. Allen, […], →OCLC, pages 489–490

The effect of the inclusible R factor in the doubly infected recipient was also expressed in the colony size. These results suggested that exclusibility and inclusibility are mutually independent phenomena and that exclusibility and inclusibility are dominant over non-exclusibility and non-inclusibility, respectively.

1970, Masanosuke Yoshikawa, Katsuko Sakai, “Interaction between R₇₀₀ and Rₜₛ₁: Genetic characterization of the segragants obtained from the double infectant”, in Progress in Antimicrobial and Anticancer Chemotherapy […], volume II, Baltimore, Md.; Manchester: University Park Press, →ISBN, section B2 (Biochemical and Genetic Mechanism of Drug Resistance), page 533

One crucial difference is that, while Tamil affines are defined consistently, by Aristotelian class logic, Paliyan affines and cross-sex relatives are defined in terms of each speaker’s sense of each individual relative’s inclusibility in fuzzy sets.

2000, Peter M. Gardner, “Kinship”, in Bicultural Versatility as a Frontier Adaptation Among Paliyan Foragers of South India (Studies in the History and Civilizations of India; 2), Lewiston, N.Y.; Queenston, Ont.; Lampeter, Ceredigion: Edwin Mellen Press, →ISBN, chapter 6 (Social organization), page 113

Spread freedom, let it ring / Fly peaceably on eagle’s wings / This truth we hold above everything / Let the whole world come to see / The power of inclusibility […]

2006, Ruth Joseph, “Come Forth Lazarus”, in My Song: Many Verses: A Book of Poetry, Lincoln, Neb.: iUniverse, →ISBN, page 95