knyaginya

plural knyaginyas · alternative kniaginia

1. A Slavic princess consort.

   As the remembrance formula is more developed in the second edition, we present it here: […] for the right-believing Ladies and Great Knyaginyas Maria Nikolaevna, Olga Nikolaevna, and for her husband: […]

   2022, Lucian Petroaia, “The Great Litany”, in The Hieratikon, a Treasure of Orthodox Culture and Spirituality: Study on Romanian Editions (Forum Orthodoxe Theologie; 21), Münster: LIT Verlag, →ISBN, chapter IV (The Content of the Romanian Hieratikon. Liturgical and Theological Analysis), section “The Evolution of the Office of the Holy Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom, in the Romanian Hieratikon”, pages 279–280

   3 more examples

   Although the above documents show the knyaginya’s activity, preserved and documented only under her name from the second marriage, with the exception of the will of Fedor Sanguszko, they do simultaneously present her character.

   2013, Bogusław Andrzej Baczyński, Małgorzata Baczyńska, “The Testament Donation of Knyaz Fedor Sanguszko for the Monastery of St. Paul of Xeropotamou on the Holy Mount Athos (9ᵗʰ November 1547)”, in Studia Ceranea, number 3, →DOI, →ISSN, page 200

   She said that it was certainly a kingly feat to dispatch one’s own brothers from the world, as her husband Yaroslav the Wise had done, but as knyaginya, she found it far less honorable for Yaroslav to have four wives in addition to herself, as well as seven concubines.

   2016, Halldór Laxness, translated by Philip Roughton, Wayward Heroes, New York, N.Y.: Archipelago Books, →ISBN, page 410

   It should be noted that we believe it is absolutely certain that all these miliarensia, handed out so generously by the Byzantine emperor to the Russian knyaginya and different members of her entourage on this visit, which took place in 946, were of the type “Constantine VII with Romanos II”, whose production had begun only about a year and a half earlier.

   2022, Vladimir Penchev, “What the coins from the Preslav treasure can tell us about the social status of its owner”, in Contributions to Bulgarian Archaeology, volume XII, →DOI, →ISSN, page 72