templatizable

Closures would be reassignable and templatizable, and of course used as values, leading to some ugly syntax without typedefs, but one could contemplate something along the following lines: […]

2006 August 22, The Ghost In The Machine, “Re: Java FACT ?”, in comp.lang.java.advocacy (Usenet)

One can also split the problem into pieces, which gets kind of ugly in C, but might be templatizable in C++: […]

2006 December 17, "The Ghost In The Machine" (username), "Re: Goto's labels makes code _Tons_ more readable ( and lest nested ).", in sci.physics and alt.usenet.kooks, Usenet

Next, TTBOMK you need to do your classes in header files if you are going to make them into generic templates...well, putting them into headers isn't strictly a requirement but the other restrictions for (templatizable code) would encourage only using headers.

2007 January 22, "noone" (username), "work related dig regarding separation of definitions and implementations", in comp.lang.c++, Usenet