the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must

alternative the strong do what they can, the weak suffer what they must

1. chiefly international relationsThe weak cannot resist the decisions of the strong; power, not morality, decides the outcome of any dispute.

   Bitter is the necessity of it. It knows no law. In the world the strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must.

   1924 November, Arthur W. Wheen, “Two Masters”, in The London Mercury, volume 11, number 61, page 35

   5 more examples

   But the present organisation of society, national and international, works on the principle that the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.

   1970, Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, Radhakrishnan: Selected Writings on Philosophy, Religion and Culture, →ISBN, page 48

   I felt then, as I do now, that the growth of the United Nations into a truly effective world organization was our best, perhaps our last, hope of bringing about enduring and creative peace if mankind was to end a savage tradition that the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.

   1972, Lester B. Pearson, Memoirs, 1897–1948: Through Diplomacy to Politics, →ISBN, page 283

   But for the weak, power – the power of others – is largely a source of inequality and subordination. The strong do what they can. The weak suffer what they must, including hierarchic subordination.

   2000, Jack Donnelly, Realism in International Relations, →ISBN, page 101

   The unilateral actions on the part of the United States, as in Iraq, threaten not so much the integrity of the Concert as the foundational norms of international society, such as sovereignty and non-intervention, which had provided the basis for that society in the first place. If this trend continues, we may end up with a hyper-realist world in which “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must”.

   2006, Mohammed Ayoob, Matthew Zierler, “The unipolar concert: Unipolarity and multilateralism in the age of globalization”, in Ramesh Thakur, Waheguru Pal Singh Sidhu, editors, The Iraq Crisis and the World Order: Structural, Institutional and Normative Challenges, →ISBN, pages 52–3

   The overall argument is that powerful states and wealthy capitalists use what power they have to gain even more power. They save the lucrative parts of the production process for themselves, and force weaker actors into the parts that yield relatively little reward. ¶ In this respect, economic structuralism fully agrees with the realist statement that “the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must”.

   2021, Paul D’Anieri, International Politics: Power and Purpose in Global Affairs, 5th edition, →ISBN, pages 90, 92