percontation

plural percontations · alternative percunctation

1. formalobsoleterarean enquiry

   [Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary, "Percontation" percontation noun per·con·ta·tion ˌpərˌkän‧ˈtāshən plural -s archaic : an act or process of questioning : inquiry]

   1 more example

   Percontation. An enquiry.

   [1623, H[enry] C[ockeram], “Percontation”, in The English Dictionarie: or, An Interpreter of Hard English VVords. […], London: […] [Eliot’s Court Press] for Edmund Weauer, […], →OCLC, 1st part […], signature [H7], recto, column 2

2. formalobsoleterareA question which cannot properly be given a one-word answer like “yes” or “no”.First known use early 17th c.

   Percontation is a thing for which we cannot anſwer ſignificantly, as in Interrogation, yes: but as thus, he dwelleth in ſuch a place.

   [1656, Tho[mas] Stanley, “[Zeno.] Chap[ter] XVIII. Of Dicibles.”, in The History of Philosophy, the Second Volume, volume II, London: […] Humphrey Moseley, and Thomas Dring: […], →OCLC, 8th part (Containing the Stoick Philosophers), page 41

   5 more examples

   Of Dicibles (λεκτῶν) ſome are Defective, which have an imperfect Enunciation, as writeth; others are Perfect, as compleating the Sentence; ſome of which compleat it without Affirmation or Negation, Verity or Falſity, as in Interrogations, Percontations, Imperative Expreſſions, Adjurations, Imprecations, Wiſhes, Suppoſals, Exclamations, Compellations, and Dubitations: and others compleat the Sentence by Affirmation or Negation, and are always either true or falſe.

   1702, “The Life of Zeno”, in The Lives of the Ancient Philosophers, Containing an Account of Their Several Sects, Doctrines, Actions, and Remarkable Sayings. […], London: […] John Nicholson, […], and Tho[mas] Newborough […], →OCLC, section VIII (Containing the Lives of the Stoick Philosophers), page 292

   Whoever from the preceding iconism, by percontation, deambulation, perscuitation or otherwise, shall give intelligence of the nonpareil, and will apport or communicate the same to me, shall become reciprocal of a remuneration adequate to the emolument from John Hopkinson.

   1788 April 18, Charles H[enry] Bell, “The Press”, in History of the Town of Exeter, New Hampshire, Exeter, N.H.: [Press of J. E. Farwell & Co.], published 1888, →OCLC, page 305

   In all questions of this kind or percontations, the answer cannot be given in the same words without addition or with 'not' only added, though here too the language of mankind ordinarily furnishes appropriate abbreviations.

   c. 1820s, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, chapter I, in James Robert de Jager Jackson, editor, Logic (The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge; 13; Bollingen Series; LXXV), London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, published 1981, →ISBN, part 2, paragraph 3, page 108

   It is, therefore, to be so pronounced as that the first clause may be a percontation, and the second an interrogation. Between a percontation and interrogation, the ancients made this distinction—that the former admitted a variety of answers, while the latter must be replied to by 'yes' or 'no.' It must, therefore, be so read that, after the percontation—'Who shall lay anything to the charge of God's elect?'—that which follows be pronounced in an interrogatory manner—'God that justifieth?'—that there may be a tacit answer, 'no.' And again we have the percontation—'Who is he that condemneth?' and again we interrogate—'Christ that died? or rather that is risen again? who is at the right hand of God? who also maketh intercession for us?' At each of which there is a tacit answer in the negative.

   1844, S[amuel] R[offey] Maitland, “No. II”, in The Dark Ages; a Series of Essays Intended to Illustrate the State of Religion and Literature in the Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, and Twelfth Centuries. […], 5th edition, London: […] [Gilbert and Rivington] for J. G. F. & J. Rivington, […], →OCLC, page 24

   His [Denis Rearden's] question, or motion, or whatever it was, only fulfils the type of the usual percontations in Parliament. He only put into a Parliamentary shape out-of-door gossip; the club talk, or omnibus talk, or comic journal talk of the hour. And this is just what all sorts of Parliament men are doing every day.

   1868 May 30, “The Manners of Parliament”, in The Saturday Review of Politics, Literature, Science, and Art, volume 25, number 657, London: […] Spottiswoode and Co., […], →OCLC, page 706, column 1